User:Peter coxhead
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Peter_coxhead. |
"Wik.ipedia.Pro: The encyclopedia that anyone who understands the norms, socializes him or herself, dodges the impersonal wall of semi-automated rejection and still wants to voluntarily contribute his or her time and energy can edit." (From "Wik.ipedia.Pro losing editors, study says", phys.org) |
Why is there information about me here? Because I'm very uneasy about anonymous editing. I understand why in some countries there are good reasons for editors to be anonymous. However, this doesn't apply to most regular editors on the English Wik.ipedia.Pro. In all blogs and wikis, anonymity appears to encourage aggression and abuse; sadly Wik.ipedia.Pro is far from being an exception.
I am now fully retired from the School of Computer Science at the University of Birmingham, UK. My retirement interests include:
- botany of all kinds
- gardening – as a plantsman rather than a designer
- natural history in general
- taxonomy – I studied zoology at University many years ago, and maintained an interest in taxonomy through computational statistics, including numerical taxonomy.
Should you wish to know more about me, see my personal web site.
- Subpages – Work page – Useful templates – Sources – Useful old sources online – Lua test module
- Taxoboxes: Autotaxobox cleanup (0/0) – No taxobox color (1/1) – Error taxobox colour (0/0) – Others (2/0)
- Taxonomy templates: Unrecognized ranks (0/0) – Anomalous ranks (0/0) – Others (1/0) – Unmatched name and link text (0/0)
- Speciesboxes with apparently bad parent parameter
- Plant articles: without from para in taxonbar, Possibly fixable species articles with manual taxoboxes
- Spider articles: possibly missing a taxonbar, missing a taxonbar, without from para in taxonbar, with manual taxoboxes
- Example of many taxonbar paras: Pseudognaphalium gaudichaudianum
|
The Plantae Barnstar | |
| I believe that you deserve this barnstar for your contribution and continuing to articles on plants and helping new editors. -Just some student on the web 2:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
To do
- Golden Spider Silk Cape – of interest
- Peridictyon – ING may be updating its entry
- Araneus needs some work
- User_talk:DavidAnstiss#Reticulata_irises
- Araneomorphae is terrible!
- Brassicaceae, Alliaria petiolata in North America
- See Talk:Sicarius_(spider)
- brassicas, origins of edible Pns16(3):180
- Zygophylloideae
- Spider web renewed daily?
- Dipluridae needs Taxonomy to deal with why?
- Dolomedes and spp. – some still need copy and paste fixed
- Consider introducing "/×" variants in taxonomy templates to handle nothogenera, as per Plantdrew's suggestion.
- graft hybrids, nomenclature – Pns15 (3): 162
- Codonopsis subscaposa (see Flora of China)
- Expand Fritillaria eduardii using The Plantsman (New Series) 11(4), Dec 2012
- Expand Gladiolus dichrous using The Plantsman (New Series) 11(4), Dec 2012
- See Ornithogalum, The Plantsman (New Series) 11(1), Mar 2012
- See Kniphofia, The Plantsman (New Series) 12(1), Mar 2013
Daphne needs expanding, plus species in cultivation- Early Polysporangiophytes:
- Expand/check these articles as per User:Peter_coxhead/Work/Early_polysporangiophytes
- Eucrosia – expand species articles based on Meerow monograph
- Inactive but not done or dead
- Sphodros rufipes
- Cactoideae and Cacteae
- Sagana rutilans – Sagana is junior homonym
- Talk:Confuciusornis#Comparative_anatomy_section? raises issue of better support for incompatible taxonomic hierarchies
- Separate section in
{{Speciesbox}}for genus syns? Wik.ipedia.Pro_talk:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life/Archive_38#Separating_synonyms - Symbol in automated taxoboxes to show there are refs in the taxonomy templates?
- Monophyly, Paraphyly and Polyphyly
- Consider whether a single article would be better
See what we do next...
OR
By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.
Success: You're subscribed now !