Template talk:Threatened species
This template does not require a rating on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Two other IUCN categories?
I have also seen "Fossil" and "Not Described" listed as conservation status categories in various places -- are these official, or otherwise have some wide consensus on use? I also recall a reference to the Barbados Raccoon Procyon lotor gloveralleni as "Disputed" somewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.95.162.30 (talk) 10:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- You have asked this question in more than one place. There is a reply here. --Epipelagic (talk) 05:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Replaced image due to possible copyvio
The template used a lemur image that I just nominated for deletion on Commons due to copyright violation concerns. I replaced it (with the FP of the top of the "threatened species" article) in order to not have a file-not-found error when (if) the Commons image gets deleted. Feel free to replace it with anything that seems more appropriate. TigraanClick here to contact me 13:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
See what we do next...
OR
By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.
Success: You're subscribed now !