User talk:Gonnym

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Sorry to have stepped on your toes, but I was trying to figure out how to add the production designer as a parameter for the info box on a shows page, but I must have done something wrong because you deleted my work. The production designer is the head of the art department and is responsible for the shows visual style and sets, but doesn’t seem to be listed anywhere on a shows page - specifically referencing the page for Star Wars: Skeleton Crew in this instance. Thanks for any guidance! City Kate (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any new parameter needs to be proposed at Template talk:Infobox television and get consensus to be added. What you did just changed the documentation without really adding the functionality to the template itself. Do note though, that this specific parameter was proposed in the past and didn't get consensus to be added, but who knows, this time it might be different. Gonnym (talk) 16:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood! Sorry, am new to all this. I will propose it over there and see if it’s received. Thank you! City Kate (talk) 17:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Gonnym, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 22:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 22:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the recent deletion of most lang-xx, it's clear people don't care about old revisions and my objection to deleting IPA-xx seems no longer justifiable. Are you still thinking of getting them deleted? Nardog (talk) 12:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are asking if I'm still in favor, then yes. Gonnym (talk) 14:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to ask if you were going to nominate them, but I've done it myself anyway. Nardog (talk) 02:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Mick Rory (Arrowverse Earth-74) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 28 § Mick Rory (Arrowverse Earth-74) until a consensus is reached. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:15, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. It's entirely inappropriate to accuse editors in good standing of abusing page mover permissions. To immediately jump to that conclusion, of abusing the tools at their disposal, is insulting and an obvious assumption of bad faith. I believe I've certainly earned the benefit of the doubt and I expected better from you, so it was definitely a blind side to receive a ping and a demand from you without any relevant context for such a demand. The request that was made of me would have easily been processed at WP:RM/TR. You can and should be doing better. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your silly demands, you want me to move Disney XD (Italy) back to Disney XD (Italy)), which would be an obviously inappropriate page title. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no assuming good faith in moving controversial pages without discussion. I was also clearly correct in my stance giving that your very edit here starts with Based on your silly demands. And no, I didn't want you to move the page to that incorrect title, instead I expected admins to be smarter than the average user, and actually look at the edit history and see that the article title was at Disney XD (Italian TV channel) before being incorrectly moved there. I would restore it myself, but from the few I've tried, I got a message telling me I can't, which probably has to do with those two moves you both did. Gonnym (talk) 11:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Although I broadly agree with the substitutions you are making (not least because they display on mobile, unlike the sidebars {{today/AD/AM}} etc.), that template really needs to have optional selection of which calendars are displayed before doing any more swops. Do you speak enough templatish to do that?

(FYI, I have also asked Jonesey95 the same question.) 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 18:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I don't agree. I think having this be Gregorian-x is counter to what Wik.ipedia.Pro is for. If a "Today" template has any reason for existing, it should be broad enough that someone can actually gain knowledge from it, and not be a piece of simple trivia. Gonnym (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then the problem is its positioning. As an infobar at the bottom of the article, it would be neutral. At the top of the articles, typically just after the lead when seen on mobile, it comes across as pov-pushing. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AstroLynx:, do you have a view in this? Does this discussion need wider visibility? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that this should discussed more widely with the input of other editors. It is nice to have a date converter in the info-box of the various religious calendars but why the dates in the other calendars? When one wants to know the date in (say) the Islamic calendar then those other dates are more of a distraction than useful. What I would also like to know is how they were computed, which assumptions were made, and how were they tested. I am puzzled about the Byzantine calendar (who still uses it?) -- I always believed it was based on the Julian calendar but with a different beginning of the year. AstroLynx (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you think some should be removed altogether, that can be done. As I said below, I took what was in the other templates or in manual tables on linked pages. We don't cater to the someone who wants to know a specific thing. If they want to know the current date in the Islamic calendar, they should go to google. If they want to understand the context in which that date lives, they can learn it here. Do not confuse these two things. Gonnym (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For the Islamic calendar page only give the Islamic date, for the Hebrew calendar page only the Hebrew date, etc. I still think that these date converters need to be sourced -- if they are sourced, they are pretty well hard to find. AstroLynx (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I should explain why I see a reasonable sensitivity. If the article is about a calendar in general, then an infobox that puts it the context of other calendric systems is entirely reasonable. But if the article is about a specific religious date like Roshanna or 1 Muharram, then why is being mentioned? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox should not be used on a specific date. Don't mistake this for something this isn't. This is not a "hey, today is x date" that should be spammed on every page. This should only be used on related articles. I've placed it on the pages the previous templates were used. Gonnym (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Such as Islamic New Year, for example? (Should it be removed as it is not an article about a calendar? I can see it having a value there, if only for people who are using it to check how many days are left.) But hey, I'm a card-carrying atheist so maybe I'm over-compensating? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gonnym. When updating Tulsi Peeth & Smarta tradition, there's an error: "Template:Indic is calling Template:IPA with more than one value for the "1" parameter".

I'm not a template expert, but it looks like a fix might be to change

  |, {{IPA|{{{lang}}}|1={{{indicipa}}}|2=IPA|3={{{indicaudio|}}}}}

to:

  |, {{IPA|1={{{lang}}}|2={{{indicipa}}}|3=IPA|4={{{indicaudio|}}}}}

Davemck (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you reverting all my work? Category:All uncategorized pages says that it needs to be cleaned out. Please stop reverting my stuff and I'll start putting all of those templates in their correct areas. Bondishloka (talk) 17:26, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask the reason for changing from "Use Scottish English" to "Use British English" here? Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AWB general fixes. There is no real {{Use Scottish English}}, it's a redirect so absolutely nothing was changed. Gonnym (talk) 22:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you're going to remove the IPA formatting from tables, please replace it on the IPA items. Thanks. — kwami (talk) 17:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]