User talk:Lugnuts

I’ve worked with you on many articles and you were always a great editor to have around. Sad to see how your time on Wik.ipedia.Pro ended but maybe it is for the better. You left a legacy here and I hope that it is remembered positively.  Hamza Ali Shah  ^Talk 02:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only just saw. I'm so sorry.

Drmies (talk) 21:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry about this L. You are one of the best here on WikiP and in real life. Thanks for all your editing and for the things you shared with me over the years. Best wishes always. MarnetteD|Talk 22:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		I hereby award this barnstar to editor Lugnuts for his unrivalled and titanic contributions to the encyclopaedia. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found out what happened a few weeks back and still can't believe it. Sorry I never said anything for you at the case, didn't see this one coming. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since so many editors are reverting deletion notifications, have you considered Category:Wik.ipedia.Prons who opt out of template messages for preventing semi-automated deletion notifications from appearing on this talk page? Nythar^T.C 11:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is sad to see that your time is Wik.ipedia.Pro ended the way it did. I am one who has benefitted from your stub articles. I wouldn't have probably bothered to add more material to Devraj Puri, Santosh Reddy, Syed Moinuddin and others if you hadn't already created stubs for them. People who consider stubs as evil may not understand it. Tintin 13:06, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I'm sad that your time on Wikipeda has ended. You had made many pages and worked tirelessly to make many pages Coolberry-pedia (talk) 22:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Top read of the day
	The top read article yesterday was the 2023 ICC World Test Championship final. It has achieved over a million readers since Lugnuts created it. Well played, sir! Andrew🐉(talk) 10:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 ICC World Test Championship Final, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ktin (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im a related, he my dads cusin. How does Lugnuts know about him. 94.191.136.157 (talk) 20:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lugnuts won't be able to answer you. But he wrote articles about Olympians, mostly using online sources for info. Most articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro are written by people who don't personally know the subject. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 20:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can email Lugnuts if you really want to know, he cannot answer here unfortunately. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 22:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am really sorry to see your block. I will be nominating a bunch of articles of yours for deletion over the coming weeks, I mean no offense to the work you've put in. If you think the prods are contestable, please shoot me an email. JayCubby Talk 01:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Renato Prono has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability and significant coverage criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shrug02 (talk) 00:48, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lev Kokorin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability and significant coverage criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shrug02 (talk) 00:48, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lachezar Shumkov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability and significant coverage criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shrug02 (talk) 00:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wu Chun-feng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability and significant coverage criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shrug02 (talk) 00:50, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abu Dhabi T20 Trophy is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/Abu Dhabi T20 Trophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 09:09, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 2021 ICC Champions Trophy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 19 § 2021 ICC Champions Trophy until a consensus is reached. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Hochstrasser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NATH

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayCubby 02:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rinaldo Capuzzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NATH

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayCubby 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ludwig Jahn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only notable Ludwig Jahn I can find is Friedrich Ludwig Jahn, who was an 18th century physician from Prussia and hence, obviously not this guy.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Allan Nonymous (talk) 15:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anki Lidén has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet GNG and notability is not inherited

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nswix (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aleksandar Strain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:NSPORTS fail as the only sources are databases and the only claim to notability is participation. No corresponding Serbo-Croat article, nothing found in my WP:BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 09:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jürgen Richter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:NSPORTS fail as the only sources are databases and the only claim to notability is participation. No DE wiki article, nothing found in my WP:BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 09:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stephan Kuhl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:NSPORTS fail as the only sources are databases, and the only claim to notability is participation in the Olympics. The DE wiki page is a copy/paste of one of these databases. Nothing that would help with notability found in my WP:BEFORE - based on this interview on the German Badminton federation website they had an uneventful life after the Olympics.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 10:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephan Kuhl is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/Stephan Kuhl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anton Kunz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. A clear WP:NSPORTS fails since the only source is a database and the only claim to notability is participation. No corresponding DE wiki article. Nothing found in my WP:BEFORE going to the 10th page of Google hits though there are a number of other Anton Kunz's (e.g., a WW1 war poet, a 19th century composer).

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 12:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cesare Toraldo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:NSPORTS fail as the only source is a database and the only claim to notability here is participation in the Olympics. The corresponding IT wiki article doesn't include anything more in terms of sourcing or anything that indicates notability for him personally (the closest is the Golden Collar award, but this appears to be minor since receiving it doesn't seem to have the subject of coverage). In my WP:BEFORE I went through the first ten pages of GHits and saw only mirrors of this site and Olympedia, and passing mentions in 1996 news reports - no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yvon Mariolle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:NSPORTS fail as the only source is a database (Sports-Reference.com and Olympedia are essentially the same source) and the only claim to notability is participation in the Olympics. No FR Wiki article. Nothing but mirrors and passing mentions found in my WP:BEFORE paging through to the 7th page of Ghits.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 13:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Norman Biddulph has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:NSPORTS fail as the only sources are databases - including literally the census that included everyone alive in the UK at the time it was taken. Nothing found in my WP:BEFORE paging through the 6 pages of GHits.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 13:19, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wilfred Bird has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:NSPORTS fail since the only coverage is in databases and this young man was sadly cut down in his prime during WW1.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 13:26, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Azhar Attari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:NSPORTS fail as the only source cited is the Cricinfo database. No sources cited in the Urdu Wiki article. Nothing found in my WP:BEFORE going through to the 10th page of GHits.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 13:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Siegfried Gurschler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:SPORTS fail as the only source cited is the Sports Reference/Olympedia database (which are the same thing). No DE Wiki article. nothing found in my WP:BEFORE going to the 10th page of Ghits, though the existence of an architect by the same name complicates this.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 13:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Richard Smith (umpire) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Clear WP:NSPORTS fail since the only source is the CricInfo database. This guy is literally an umpire.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FOARP (talk) 13:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Bob Willis is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Bob Willis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 13:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rinaldo Capuzzi is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/Rinaldo Capuzzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 17:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azhar Attari is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/Azhar Attari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilfred Bird is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/Wilfred Bird until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Smith (umpire) is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/Richard Smith (umpire) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 08:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Povl Wøldike requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wik.ipedia.Pro. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norman Biddulph is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/Norman Biddulph until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 08:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Félix Valverde has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 21 § Félix Valverde until a consensus is reached. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:38, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]